Mai shari’a Todd W. Robinson na gundumar Kudancin California kwanan nan ya yi watsi da wata ƙarar matakin matakin da ake ɗauka a kan Edgewell Personal Care, ƙera tawul ɗin hannu na Wet Ones antibacterial, yana mai iƙirarin cewa kamfanin na iya kashe kashi 99.99% na ƙwayoyin cuta a madadin Wet Ones kuma shine. "hypoallergenic". Don haka ɓatar da masu amfani. "Lafiya." Lokacin da aka yi watsi da da'awar mai ƙara, kotun ta ce babu wani mabukaci mai hankali da zai yi tunanin cewa waɗannan maganganun suna nufin cewa Wet Ones zai iya kashe 99.99% na kowane nau'in kwayoyin cuta (ciki har da kwayoyin da ba a sani ba a hannu), ko kuma cewa gogewa sun kasance gaba daya Ba ya ƙunshi allergens ko fata irritants. Souter v. Edgewell Keɓaɓɓen Care Co., Lamba 20-cv-1486 (SD Cal. Yuni 7, 2021).
Alamar samfurin Wet Ones ta bayyana cewa jikakken goge-goge "yana kashe [99.99% na ƙwayoyin cuta." Mai shigar da karar ya yi ikirarin cewa bayanin na yaudara ne saboda sinadaran da ke cikin jikayen goge baki “ba su da tasiri a kan wasu ƙwayoyin cuta, ƙwayoyin cuta da spores, waɗanda suka ƙunshi fiye da 0.01% na ƙwayoyin cuta kuma suna iya haifar da mummunar cuta.” Musamman, mai gabatar da kara ya yi iƙirarin cewa waɗannan goge-goge ba za su iya kare masu amfani da su daga cututtukan da ke haifar da abinci, cututtukan da ake kamuwa da su ta hanyar jima'i, polio da COVID-19 ba.
Duk da haka, kotu ta gano cewa "babu wani mabukaci mai hankali da za a yaudare shi da [waɗannan maganganun] kamar yadda mai ƙara ya yi iƙirari." Mai shigar da karar bai bayyana "ta yaya ko me yasa masu amfani da hankali suka yi imanin cewa tawul ɗin hannu na iya hana waɗannan ƙwayoyin cuta da cututtuka ba." A gaskiya ma, kotu Ba abin mamaki ba ne cewa mabukaci mai hankali zai yarda cewa tawul ɗin takarda zai iya kare su daga cututtuka irin su polio ko HPV. Akasin haka, idan wani abu, kotu ta gano cewa mabukaci mai hankali zai yi zargin cewa tawul ɗin hannu zai yi tasiri ne kawai akan ƙwayoyin cuta. Koken mai karar ya kasa bayyana yadda nau’in kwayoyin cuta da ta samu ke hannunta.
Kotun kuma ba ta yi imanin cewa amfani da waɗanda ake tuhumar suka yi ba kamar "hypoallergenic" da "m" na yaudara ne. Ya gano cewa "[babu] masu amfani masu dacewa za su karanta'hypoallergenic' da' m 'ma'ana cewa [samfurin] ba shi da wani sinadaran da zai iya haifar da rashin lafiyan halayen." Akasin haka, masu amfani masu ma'ana suna iya yin bayanin lakabin Haɗarin haushin fata ga samfurin ya ragu (maimakon rashin yiwuwar haɗari). Bugu da ƙari, kotu ta gano cewa masu amfani da hankali za su iya fahimtar waɗannan sharuɗɗa don isar da bayanai game da tasirin Rike akan fata, maimakon bayanin abubuwan da ke cikinta.
Wannan shawarar tana tunatar da mutane mahimmancin mahallin wajen tantance hanyoyin ɗaukar mabukaci masu ma'ana. Lokacin da mai gabatar da kara ya yi watsi da mahallin kuma ya yi iƙirarin ya kwashe bayanan da ba su dace ba, kokensu ya balaga kuma ana iya watsi da shi.
Disclaimer: Saboda gabaɗayan wannan sabuntawa, bayanin da aka bayar anan bazai dace da kowane yanayi ba, kuma bai kamata a ɗauki mataki ba tare da takamaiman shawarar doka bisa takamaiman yanayi ba.
© Proskauer-Yau's Talla Law var = sabuwar Kwanan wata(); var yyyy = today.getFullYear(); document.write (yyyy + ""); | Tallan Lauya
Wannan gidan yanar gizon yana amfani da kukis don haɓaka ƙwarewar mai amfani, bin diddigin amfani da gidan yanar gizon da ba a san shi ba, adana alamun izini da ba da izinin rabawa akan hanyoyin sadarwar zamantakewa. Ta ci gaba da binciken wannan gidan yanar gizon, kun yarda da amfani da kukis. Danna nan don karanta ƙarin game da yadda muke amfani da kukis.
Haƙƙin mallaka © var yau = sabuwar Kwanan wata (); var yyyy = today.getFullYear(); document.write (yyyy + ""); JD Supra, LLC
Lokacin aikawa: Satumba-06-2021